12/28/2023 0 Comments Trony iphone 12 pro max![]() However, almost every other free piece of Slicer software out there seemed to work just fine. When it came to the software, I couldn't get this to work with the printer. When it comes to print quality, the models produced were surprisingly good, and the fact that the printer was quiet and fast was a huge positive. It is a shame that the spool reel isn't supplied and that the power pack is separate from the rest of the printer, but then that's why it's the price it is. Once assembled the printer itself is impressive and solid. Other cheap parts have also been used where something a little more substantial might have been better.Īs previously mentioned, you do have about a week after the build where you find that nuts and bolts have come loose and a little Loctite is needed to keep things together. The kit itself is of decent quality, although you can see where the company has saved money by using standard rather than locking bolts. It will also give you a good idea of how the printer works and ultimately how to fix it if it all goes wrong. Arriving as a kit, it's fun to put together and will show you the inner workings of a 3D printer in a way that buying one prebuilt won't. Final verdictĪt less than £150 the Tronxy X1 looks like a great deal, and it is. That being said, this printer gives you an access point to 3D printing technology, and for the money, it gives you something that few other printers at sub £150 can provide. It's a little like stepping back several generations of 3D printer. The key to quality from the small printer is ensuring that everything is level, tightened and correct before each print. Through the test, I used a high-quality filament that usually doesn't suffer from warping, however here at the corners, there was a slight lift from the edges. This is related to the relatively low bridging test score and again can be attributed to the lack of fan pointing in this direction. You can see a slight squaring rather than perfect rounds and flipping the test over and looking at the overhangs you can see some filament dropping. I have little doubt that with a few additions such as a fan to cool the filament and a little more tweaking, this printer could rise to the low 20's.Īlthough the score shows good dimensional accuracy, a close look at the print shows where it has struggled with the smooth cylinders that make up the test. 16 out of 30 is nothing remarkable until you consider the price tag and the fact that it's a self-build. The print test showed promise for this small printer. Target 5 = X: 5mm / 0mm Error | Y: 4.9mm / 0.1mm ErrorĪdding up the totals gives a final score of 16 out of 30.Moving on to the significant and tricky print quality test, and this really started to show where the printer struggled with some quality aspects. The normal quality model looked great with structure printing cleanly, as the quality increased the small nozzle and lack of cooling fan led to some stringing and a few very minor issues with the extrusion flow, but not so much that you'd be bothered.įast prints were fast and generally trouble-free, and while the print platform was small, for the majority of objects, it was more than adequate. ![]() The first test was to print 3DBenchy, and the results were impressive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |